# World Fund Financial Model

European climate tech VC fund targeting startups with Carbon Performance Potential (CPP) of at least 100 MtCO2e/year

- Canonical: https://finamodel.com/startups/world-fund
- Excel download: https://finamodel.com/startup-models/world-fund.xlsx
- Category: Climate/Energy
- Model type: VC Fund Waterfall
- Funding round: Fund
- Funding: $365M
- Founded: 2022
- Geography: European technologies with global applicability [DECK slide 5]; LP base >150 individuals & families across Europe [DECK slide 12]
- Customer: B2B

## About the company

World Fund is a European climate-tech venture fund investing from seed to Series B in companies with at least 100 MtCO2e of annual Carbon Performance Potential. It targets 10–20% ownership, reserves more than 65% of capital for follow-ons, and combines investing with policy and ecosystem access.

The LP pitch points to a large decarbonisation opportunity, a team history of more than 70 investments at 8.9x MOIC, and six Fund I deals at 1.4x MOIC. More than 1,650 inbound opportunities and a network of over 150 individuals and families support sourcing and fundraising.

The financial model should be a ten-year fund waterfall. Forecast commitments, calls, management fees, portfolio construction, initial and follow-on deployment, ownership, losses, exit proceeds, and distribution timing; then calculate carry and LP DPI, RVPI, TVPI, and net IRR. A corporate operating model would misrepresent the economics.

## What's included

- 5-year monthly revenue build with stage-appropriate growth assumptions
- Full P&L, headcount plan, and operating-expense schedule
- Cash-flow statement, runway, and burn-rate tracking
- Valuation via exit multiple with a DCF cross-check
- Returns analysis with MOIC and IRR
- Unit economics including CAC, LTV, payback, and cohort retention

## Product & value proposition

- Fund invests in climate tech startups from Seed to Series B
- Proprietary Climate Performance Potential (CPP) framework: minimum threshold of 100 MtCO2e annual reduction potential per portfolio company
- CPP methodology developed with CRANE, Project Drawdown, and TU Berlin
- Target ownership: 10–20% equity with active board roles
- Follow-on reserves: >65% of fund reserved for follow-on
- Competitive edge: thought leadership (highest-visibility climate tech VC per deck), >1,650 inbound deals since launch, policy influence via Cleantech for Europe, CRANE, European Parliament, German Ministry of Economy
- LP platform: >150 HNWIs, >120 interested in active involvement, LPs built >10 unicorns

## Market

- €5tr market opportunity from decarbonization transformation
- €5.9tr in corporate revenue committed to Net-Zero that needs to be served
- Stacked-column chart (slide 4) shows mismatch: Mobility represents 16% of global emissions (2016) but received 61% of climate tech VC (2013–H1 2021); Energy 29% emissions vs. ~9% VC; Food & Agriculture 20% emissions vs. 12% VC; Built Environment 14% emissions vs. ~15% VC; Industry 21% emissions vs. ~4% VC
- "The next 1,000 unicorns will be in climate tech" - Larry Fink, Blackrock
- Europe: first continent to become net-zero by law

## Revenue model

This is a fund, not an operating company. Economics follow standard VC fund structure:
- LP capital deployment: Multi-stage Seed to Series B; follow-on reserves >65%
- Target ownership per deal: 10–20%

## Traction & metrics

- >70 investments by the team historically, 8.9x MOIC
- Fund I portfolio: 6 deals executed since 2021, performing at 1.4x MOIC
- Portfolio companies: Space Forge, Q_OA, Juicy Marbles, FreshFlow, Treecard, RECUP (exited)
- RECUP marked "Exited"
- >1,650 inbound deals since launch
- LinkedIn monthly reach >1,000,000; Twitter monthly reach >5,000,000; articles published >2,000
- LP base: >150 individuals & influential families; >120 interested in monthly active involvement
- LPs built >10 unicorns across focus sectors
- LP mix by capital invested: Tech entrepreneurs 41.3%, Climate tech pioneers 23.2%, Mittelstand & DAX 19.5%, Seasoned VCs/PEs 16.0%
- Ranked #1 European ESG fund (Preqin and other platforms)

## Unit economics

Key observable data points for fund-level modelling:
- Current portfolio MOIC: 1.4x on 6 deals
- Team historical MOIC: 8.9x on >70 deals
- Target ownership: 10–20%
- Follow-on reserve ratio: >65%

## Competition / moat

- Thesis: highest-visibility climate tech VC in Europe
- CPP framework as proprietary deal selection tool (quantified, science-backed)
- Co-VC network across all five sectors (Energy, Food/Agtech, Buildings, Industry, Transport)
- Team: Best Male + Best Female Investor 2020 (Bundesverband Deutsche Startups)
- Policy influence: seats at Cleantech for Europe, European Parliament, German federal ministry, CRANE, GIIN
- Comparable funds referenced as past co-investors: BP Ventures, Octopus Ventures, SET Ventures, Sofinnova, S2G Ventures, Astanor, Demeter, 2150, Picus Capital, BMW i Ventures, MANIV

## Team & funding ask / use of funds

**Team (slide 9):**
- Tim Schumacher - Co-founder/CEO, IPOed Sedo, co-founder/chairman Eyeo (>400m users), >40 personal investments; Best Male Investor 2020
- Daria Saharova - Managing Partner Vito ONE, ex-Seven Ventures & HV Ventures, Jefferies GER; >20 early-stage investments; Best Female Investor 2020
- Danijel Visevic - Director Comms at Project A (>€500m AUM), comms office for Angela Merkel, 60k LinkedIn reach, >5m Twitter reach
- Craig Douglas - Principal at SET Ventures, ESG/climate reporting for 50+ funds, physicist & chemist

**Funding ask:** Not explicitly stated in deck. No fund size target, close date, or minimum ticket disclosed.

**Use of funds:** Multi-stage Seed to Series B climate tech investments across Energy, Food & Agriculture, Buildings, Industry & Manufacturing, Transportation

---

## Recommended financial model

- **Archetype + why:** VC Fund Economics model. This is an LP pitch for a climate tech VC fund - the entity raising money is the GP/fund vehicle, not an operating startup. The correct model tracks capital deployment, management fees, portfolio construction, exit proceeds, carry, and LP return metrics (DPI, TVPI, IRR). An operating 3-statement or SaaS model would be wrong here.

- **Forecast horizon & granularity:**
  - 10-year fund life (standard for European early-stage VC), annual granularity
  - Investment period: years 1–4 (typical Seed–Series B deployment window)
  - Harvest period: years 5–10

- **Key drivers & assumptions:**
  - Management fee rate:
  - Carried interest rate:
  - Preferred return (hurdle):
  - Number of portfolio companies:
  - Average initial check size:
  - Follow-on reserve ratio: >65%
  - Target ownership: 10–20%
  - Portfolio MOIC distribution: Base 3.0x gross / Bull 5.0x / Bear 1.5x is top-quartile; current fund at 1.4x early-stage]
  - Loss ratio (write-offs):
  - Average hold period to exit:
  - Recycling of management fees / early exits:
  - LP close / capital calls:

- **Scenarios (Base / Bull / Bear - which variables flex):**
  - Bear: Gross fund MOIC 1.5x, higher loss ratio (50%), longer hold periods - tests whether carry is earned and LPs get capital back
  - Base: Gross fund MOIC 3.0x, 35% loss ratio, 6-year average hold
  - Bull: Gross fund MOIC 5.0x, 25% loss ratio, 5-year hold, 1–2 breakout unicorn outcomes (consistent with team's 8.9x track record)

- **Required sheets / outputs:**
  1. **Assumptions** - fund size, fee rates, carry, hurdle, deployment schedule, MOIC distribution
  2. **Portfolio Construction** - number of companies, check sizes, ownership %, follow-on schedule
  3. **Capital Deployment** - annual capital calls, cumulative deployed vs. committed
  4. **P&L / Management Company** - management fees by year, fund expenses, GP economics
  5. **Exit Waterfall** - gross proceeds by company, return of capital, preferred return, carry split (GP/LP)
  6. **LP Returns** - DPI, RVPI, TVPI, net IRR by scenario
  7. **Sensitivity Table** - net IRR vs. gross MOIC and fund size (or management fee rate)

## Frequently asked questions

### Is the World Fund financial model free?

Yes. The World Fund model is a free Excel download with live formulas.

### Can I change the assumptions?

Yes. The workbook is editable and its live formulas recalculate when assumptions change.
