SPAC Model
Capital Markets Financial Model (Free Excel Download)
Evaluate SPAC transaction economics across IPO proceeds, sponsor promote, PIPE funding, redemptions, de-SPAC terms, pro forma ownership, dilution, and exits.
professionals from Deloitte
Used by professionals from






About this model
Model SPAC merger economics to see true sponsor ownership, dilution from redemptions, and pro forma capital structure without optimistic redemption assumptions. The model calculates trust account cash (IPO shares × $10, earning 4-5% T-bill yield, taxed at 21%), applies realistic redemption rates (60-90% post-2022), and sizes PIPE funding and sponsor cash to fund target acquisitions. Sources & Uses shows exactly how much cash lands on the target's balance sheet - a non-tautological capital adequacy check.
Share structure bridges IPO → de-SPAC → diluted (accounting for sponsor promote, PIPE shares, target rollover equity, warrants, and earnouts). Goodwill is computed from the target's tangible net assets (AR, PP&E, AP explicitly), not a disconnected plug. Returns analysis is granular: sponsor return (return on warrant + founder share investment), public return (dilution-adjusted - public owns a declining % as sponsor/PIPE/rollover dilute), and PIPE return (entry price basis). Pro forma balance sheet must balance; Checks sheet validates funding adequacy and covenant compliance.
Critical for deal teams evaluating de-SPAC targets, showing the economic reality (high redemption rates, sponsor dilution) vs marketing narratives. Includes sensitivity on redemption rate, exit multiple, and holding period.
What every model includes
Live formulas, no hardcoded values
Outputs are driven by live formulas, so the workbook updates from its assumptions instead of relying on hardcoded results.
All assumptions in one tab
Inputs are clearly marked in the Assumptions tab and separated from calculations, making it clear what to change and what to leave intact.
Statements always balancing
For integrated-statement models, the balance sheet, cash flow, and supporting schedules tie through properly.
Distinct schedules for clarity
Debt, working capital, taxes, and cash flow can get messy quickly. We group calculations in clear schedules, not across disconnected tabs.
No hidden macros or external links
There are no unexplained external workbook links or macros to undermine auditability or portability.
Changes flow through the model
Update a key driver and see the impact carry through the forecast, financing, and return outputs. We never use hardcoded numbers in formulas.
What's inside the SPAC Model
- IPO unit and warrant allocation logic
- Trust account interest and monthly operating expense tracking
- Sponsor promote and private placement warrant schedules
- De-SPAC transaction bridge and redemption sensitivity analysis
- PIPE financing and pro-forma capitalisation waterfall
- SPAC trust account size and sponsor commitment
- Sponsor share economics (promote, earn-out vesting)
- Redemption assumptions and PIPE funding mechanics
SPAC Model: How the Full Lifecycle Works from IPO to de-SPAC
This SPAC model template is a transaction tool for evaluating a de-SPAC business combination. It helps deal teams answer three key questions: capital adequacy, post-combination cap table, and investor returns.
The model runs from IPO trust funding through redemption, PIPE, and sponsor economics to an exit-year-driven returns analysis, all underpinned by a 7-year forecast and balancing pro forma balance sheet.
How Scenarios and Operating Drivers Shape the Analysis
The model is scenario-driven. A scenarios sheet lets you switch between low, base, and high redemption cases using a CHOOSE function that flexes five drivers: redemption rate, PIPE shares, PIPE price, sponsor forfeiture percentage, and exit multiple.
- Each scenario also carries a probability weight, so you can see how different deal outcomes affect the result. These drivers feed every downstream calculation, from trust cash to sponsor share count, without nested IF formulas.
- The 7-year forecast includes a simple P&L, a PP&E roll, and working capital based on AR, inventory, and AP days. This operating detail feeds the exit EBITDA used in returns, while debt amortises separately.
Together, these drivers let you test how redemption pressure, PIPE pricing, and sponsor forfeiture interact under a chosen scenario.
Calculation Flow: From Trust to Cap Table
The calculation flow starts with trust mechanics. IPO proceeds earn interest net of tax, which raises the redemption price.
- Redemptions reduce trust cash, and a deferred underwriting waiver can further adjust it. The resulting trust cash available, plus PIPE proceeds and sponsor at-risk capital, forms total sources.
- Uses include target cash consideration—enterprise value less net debt and rollover value—and transaction costs. The residual is cash to the balance sheet.
- Meanwhile, the share structure builds from non-redeeming shares, sponsor founder shares adjusted for forfeiture, PIPE shares, and rollover shares. Warrants are treated with the treasury stock method and earnout shares are added only if the exit price clears specified triggers.
This produces pro forma basic and diluted share counts, which then feed exit price per share and returns.
Outputs: Returns, Balance Sheet, and Sensitivity Views
The model outputs three main views. First, returns analysis: sponsor MOIC and IRR (driven by an exit year from 1 to 7 and an exit multiple), public shareholder return, and PIPE return.
- Exit EBITDA and net debt are pulled from the forecast and debt schedule by the chosen exit year. Second, the pro forma balance sheet balances by construction because public equity is booked at trust cash available, sponsor equity at at-risk capital, PIPE at proceeds, rollover at value, and retained earnings at negative transaction costs—goodwill is calculated, not plugged.
- Third, two sensitivity grids show public return against redemption and exit multiple, and cash to balance sheet against redemption and PIPE size. Conditional formatting highlights outputs, giving a quick read on how key variables influence outcomes.
Practical Use: Evaluating a SPAC Deal
For a deal team, this model serves as a transaction evaluation tool. The trio of capital adequacy, cap table, and returns questions guides the analysis: you can see if enough cash lands on the target's balance sheet after redemptions and costs, what ownership looks like across public, sponsor, PIPE, and rollover holders, and what sponsor, public, and PIPE investors earn at exit.
- The model includes 20 tie-out checks on a dedicated sheet to validate balance sheet integrity, ownership sums, and scenario consistency. The public download is a values-only preview; the underlying template captures the full calculation logic.
- The design is intentionally a transaction model, not an operating model—the 7-year forecast exists to feed the exit-year-driven returns analysis. Use it to structure and stress-test a de-SPAC deal.



Formatted to IB standards
Named theme colors repaint the whole workbook in one click, on top of an investment-banking structure with clear input, output, and cross-sheet reference styling - brand-ready, institutional-grade, and fully auditable.
Created by ex-finance professionals
Hey, I’m Alex and I created Finamodel.
Over my years in the finance industry I kept building the same models over and over again. Same structure, same assumptions, different logo. So I started building frameworks to turn them into clean, reusable templates.
Every model here is one I’d actually use for a client, and I personally vet each one before it goes up.
I’m not an expert in every industry, but I’ve built enough models to know what belongs in one. And when something is completely foreign to me, I reach out to my network for experts to work on our models with us.
Having a template library on hand cuts a first build from hours to minutes.
Need help finding your model? You’ll find me in the Finamodel app!
Frequently asked
What is a SPAC financial model?+
It is a model that covers the economics of a special purpose acquisition company, from IPO proceeds and trust management through to de-SPAC transaction mechanics and pro-forma ownership.
Who uses SPAC models?+
SPAC sponsors, investment bankers, PIPE investors, and target company CFOs use them for deal structuring and due diligence.
What should a SPAC model include?+
It should include IPO unit economics, trust account tracking, sponsor promote and warrant schedules, redemption sensitivity, and pro-forma capitalisation after closing.
How does it handle shareholder redemptions?+
The model includes a redemption sensitivity toggle showing how different levels of trust cash-out affect pro-forma cash, ownership dilution, and minimum cash closing conditions.
Does it model warrant dilution?+
Yes. The model includes a detailed warrant schedule for both public and private placement warrants, calculating dilutive impact at various share price levels.
Have more financial modelling questions? Contact us
Related templates
IPO Pricing and Waterfall Model
Pricing and equity distribution model for IPO transactions including valuation scenarios, dilution analysis, and founder/investor waterfalls.
M&A Modeling & Valuation
Comprehensive M&A valuation with DCF, comparable companies, and precedent transactions analysis.
Leveraged Buyout Model
Complete LBO analysis with debt financing structures, sponsor returns, and sensitivity to exit scenarios.
DCF Model
Discounted cash flow valuation model with explicit forecast, terminal value, and WACC.

