Nanonets logo
Nanonets Financial Model

Enterprise/Security Startup Financials (Free Excel Download)

AI-powered intelligent document processing and workflow automation platform that extracts structured data from unstructured documents and orchestrates downstream business workflows.

Loading...

Used by professionals from

KPMG logoWharton logoColumbia logoESSEC logoPwC logoHEC logo

About this model

Nanonets automates document processing and downstream workflows using AI. The platform extracts structured information from unstructured documents, then helps customers route that data into business systems and automated operational processes.

The company uses a product-led entry point and expands from extraction into broader automation. Revenue combines subscription elements with usage-based pricing for pages processed and workflow steps; its cited 132% net revenue retention shows that deeper adoption drives account growth.

The model separates consumption revenue from platform subscriptions. It forecasts customers, pages processed, price per extraction, workflow depth, expansion, churn, AI and infrastructure costs, gross margin, sales investment, and cash runway by cohort.

A turnkey financial model

Live formulas, no hardcoded values

Outputs are driven by live formulas, so the workbook updates from its assumptions instead of relying on hardcoded results.

All assumptions in one tab

Inputs are clearly marked in the Assumptions tab and separated from calculations, making it clear what to change and what to leave intact.

Statements always balancing

For integrated-statement models, the balance sheet, cash flow, and supporting schedules tie through properly.

Distinct schedules for clarity

Debt, working capital, taxes, and cash flow can get messy quickly. We group calculations in clear schedules, not across disconnected tabs.

No hidden macros or external links

There are no unexplained external workbook links or macros to undermine auditability or portability.

Changes flow through the model

Update a key driver and see the impact carry through the forecast, financing, and return outputs. We never use hardcoded numbers in formulas.

About Nanonets

nanonets.com
Read the pitch deck
Nanonets pitch deck cover
View on makeslides.com
Total raised
$10.0M
Funding round
Series A
Founded
2022
Category
Enterprise/Security
Customer
B2B
Geography
US-primary

How to build a detailed financial model for Nanonets

A complete walkthrough of the business, drivers, and assumptions behind the downloadable Nanonets model - distilled from its pitch deck and publicly available information.

Product & value proposition

  • Platform ingests documents (PDFs, images, email attachments, paper) via API, email, cloud storage connectors (Google Drive, Dropbox, S3, OneDrive, SharePoint).
  • AI/ML extracts structured data (OCR + deep learning fine-tuned per customer).
  • Learnable decision engines execute post-extraction workflows: PO matching, ERP writes, approvals, payments, CRM updates, Zendesk ticketing - all configurable via natural language prompt.
  • Key differentiator: self-learning ML that improves accuracy with more data (vs. rule-based OCR that degrades); customer model fine-tuned from base model via human feedback loop.
  • Primary use cases: AP automation (invoices → ERP), customer support (claims/tickets), procurement, HR onboarding.
  • Vision: "5-person $1B company" via full workflow orchestration across applications.

Market

  • Global industrial automation software market: $33.54B (2020) → $60.83B (2028), ~2x growth.
  • Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) sub-market: CAGR of 36.8% during forecast period.
  • RPA market breakdown cited: Finance & Accounting 25%, Supply Chain 15%, HR 15%, IT 15%, Customer Support 10%, Sales & Marketing 5%, Other 15%.
  • Within Finance RPA: AP automation 33%, Payroll 27%, AR 13%.
  • 34% of Fortune 500 have already used the product.

Revenue model

  • Core unit: per-page / per-extraction pricing.
  • Entry price: $0.1/page.
  • Freemium → paid conversion; scales with volume.
  • Land-and-expand motion:
  • Land: $0xx/extraction (entry per-page rate, exact cents redacted in deck).
  • Expand - More Volume: $0.xx/extraction (volume discount tier).
  • Expand - More Data Types: $xk/year (annual subscription layer for additional document types).
  • Expand - More Automation: $0.0x/step/workflow (per-step fee for workflow automation).
  • Net effect: ACV grows as customer automates more workflow steps and document types - typical upsell path from extraction-only to full workflow orchestration.
  • Channels: PLG (freemium self-serve); content marketing (SEO-heavy, AP automation example: task/state/goal/tool-oriented content); inbound from Fortune 500.
  • ICP: IT/Procurement Manager (discovers + implements), Finance/Ops Manager (identifies problem + tests), CXO of ~250-person company (approves + champions).

Traction & metrics

  • 10x ARR growth in 18 months at 0 burn (period: ~May 2020 – Aug 2021 per chart axis).
  • ARR chart shows continuous upward curve May 2020 → Aug 2021; no absolute ARR $ figure disclosed.
  • NRR: 132%.
  • Churn: <X% (specific value redacted).
  • Free trial conversion: XX% (redacted).
  • Traffic grew 3.7x in 12 months (Jul 2022 → Jul 2023).
  • 34% of Fortune 500 have used the product.
  • ARR projection chart (Series B deck): shows actual ARR bars Jan 2022 – Oct 2023, then projected bars to Jan 2025; absolute $ values not labeled on y-axis.
  • Gross margin: >XX% (exact redacted).

Unit economics

  • Gross margin: >XX% (redacted but stated as positive and high).
  • NRR 132% implies negative net revenue churn - customers expand faster than they churn.
  • Burn: 0 burn during 10x ARR growth period (base deck, ~2021). Burn status at Series B raise not stated.

Competition / moat

  • Competitive frame: Nanonets vs. Traditional OCR vs. AP-only tools:
  • Traditional OCR: IT-friendly but needs developer setup; no learning; rule-based.
  • AP-only tools (e.g., legacy AP automation): rule-based decisions; limited to one document type.
  • Nanonets: end-to-end workflows; self-learning ML; processes any document format from day 0.
  • ML moat: accuracy improves with volume (virtuous data flywheel); rule-based systems degrade with new formats.
  • Time-to-live: ML path = days (AI training + ready); rule-based path = weeks (template creation + engineering + testing).
  • Deep learning fine-tuning per customer creates switching cost: customer model is proprietary to their data.
  • Named competitors: not explicitly named in deck. Implicit: UiPath, Automation Anywhere (RPA), ABBYY, Rossum, Hypatos (IDP).
  • SaaS vs. in-house: large enterprise in-house build takes 6–12 months to production; SaaS wins on accuracy, speed, lower risk.

Team & funding ask / use of funds

  • CEO: Sarthak Jain; CTO: Prathamesh Juvatkar.
  • 13 years building ML together (universities, startups, industry).
  • EE + CS, IIT-GN 2012; previously co-founders at Cubeit.
  • Team claim: "combined 100 years in Deep Learning and AI".
  • Funding raised to date: $11.5M ($1.5M Seed YC Apr 2017 + $10M Series A Elevation Capital Oct 2021).
  • Angels: founders of BrowserStack, Chargebee, Whatfix, PubMatic, Ally.

Recommended financial model

  • Archetype + why: Usage-based SaaS ARR model with land-and-expand expansion revenue. The core billing unit is per-extraction (pages processed), with layered annual subscription and per-step workflow fees. NRR of 132% and a clear upsell motion from extraction → automation make this a classic land-and-expand PLG SaaS - cohort-based ARR tracking is the right frame. Not a pure seat-based SaaS; consumption volume and workflow depth are the key expansion levers.
  • Forecast horizon & granularity: Monthly for Year 1–2 (given PLG dynamics and rapid ARR growth), quarterly for Years 3–5. 5-year total horizon to capture the S-curve from SMB PLG → enterprise expansion.
  • Key drivers & assumptions:

*Revenue drivers:*

  • Starting ARR: ~$2–4M ARR at Series B raise (~mid-2023), inferred from 10x growth in 18 months from a small base in 2020–21, then further growth through 2022–23. No absolute number in deck.
  • New customer additions per month: split between self-serve (freemium → paid) and enterprise inbound; ratio ~70/30 at base.
  • Average initial ACV (land): ~$500–2,000/year for SMB self-serve (based on $0.1/page × est. 500–2,000 pages/month); enterprise land contracts $10–30k/year.
  • Pricing - extraction: $0.1/page entry rate; volume tier ~$0.0x/page; workflow step fee ~$0.0x/step.
  • NRR: 132% - drive expansion via page volume growth + workflow step adoption + data type expansion ($xk/year add-ons).
  • Gross churn rate: ~5–8%/year (implied by NRR 132% with net churn deeply negative; <X% monthly churn in deck).
  • Free trial conversion: ~10–20% (XX% redacted in deck); model as a sensitivity variable.
  • Enterprise pipeline: Fortune 500 penetration at 34%; upside from account expansion.

*Cost drivers:*

  • Gross margin: ~70–80% (>XX% stated in deck; typical for ML API SaaS with GPU/inference costs; exact % unknown).
  • COGS: GPU/inference compute, hosting (AWS/GCP), data labeling for model fine-tuning.
  • S&M: ~25–35% of revenue at current stage; PLG model implies lower blended CAC vs. pure enterprise.
  • R&D: ~30–40% of revenue (ML-heavy product; deep learning infra).
  • G&A: ~10–15% of revenue.
  • Burn: stated as 0 burn during 10x growth period; post-Series-B likely investment phase - model burn as S&M + R&D ramp.

*Operational drivers:*

  • Pages processed per customer per month: seed value 500 SMB / 5,000 enterprise; grows as automation expands.
  • Workflow steps per customer: starts at 0 (extraction only), grows to avg 3–5 steps/workflow as customers expand.
  • Traffic growth as PLG input: 3.7x in 12 months; top-of-funnel conversion rate ~2–4% visitor to trial.
  • Scenarios (Base / Bull / Bear - which variables flex):
  • Base: NRR holds at 130–135%; new logo adds grow at market content-led rate; gross margin 75%.
  • Bull: Enterprise penetration accelerates (Fortune 500 → $50k+ ACV); NRR expands to 140%+ as workflow automation fees compound; gross margin improves to 80%+ on scale.
  • Bear: Competition from UiPath/Microsoft Power Automate compresses pricing; free-to-paid conversion drops; NRR falls to ~110%; gross margin pressure from increased GPU costs.
  • Key flex variables: NRR, free trial conversion rate, enterprise vs. SMB mix, avg pages/customer/month, workflow step adoption rate.
  • Required sheets / outputs:
  1. Assumptions - all drivers in one place (pricing, volume, NRR, margins, headcount).
  2. ARR Bridge - new ARR, expansion ARR (volume + workflow + data types), churned ARR, net new ARR; monthly then quarterly.
  3. Cohort table - monthly cohort ARR with expansion curve; used to validate NRR.
  4. Revenue schedule - extraction revenue (pages × price), subscription revenue (data type add-ons), workflow revenue (steps × price).
  5. P&L - Revenue, COGS, Gross Profit, S&M, R&D, G&A, EBITDA, Net Income.
  6. Cash flow - operating cash, capex (minimal), ending cash / runway.
  7. KPI dashboard - ARR, MRR, NRR, gross margin %, pages processed, active customers, ACV by segment.
  8. Scenario toggle - Base / Bull / Bear switcher on key assumptions.

Frequently asked

Is the Nanonets financial model free?+

Yes. The Nanonets model is a free Excel (.xlsx) download with live formulas. Sign up with your email and the workbook is yours to keep, review, and edit.

What's included in the model?+

A 5-year monthly forecast with P&L, cash flow and runway, valuation (exit multiple plus a DCF cross-check), MOIC/IRR returns, and unit economics, with live formulas throughout.

How was this model built?+

It was built from Nanonets's pitch deck and publicly available information, then structured to investment-banking standards as a fully editable Excel model.

Can I change the assumptions?+

Yes. You can change assumptions and the live formulas will recalculate in the downloadable Excel model.

Have more financial modelling questions? Contact us

Alex Tapio, ex-Deloitte financial modelling expert

Created by ex-finance professionals

Hey, I’m Alex and I created Finamodel.

Over my years in the finance industry I kept building the same models over and over again. Same structure, same assumptions, different logo. So I started building frameworks to turn them into clean, reusable templates.

Every model here is one I’d actually use for a client, and I personally vet each one before it goes up.

I’m not an expert in every industry, but I’ve built enough models to know what belongs in one. And when something is completely foreign to me, I reach out to my network for experts to work on our models with us.

Having a template library on hand cuts a first build from hours to minutes.

Need help finding your model? You’ll find me in the Finamodel app!

Other Enterprise/Security Startup Financial Models

Browse another startup in the same category.

agbiome.xlsx
Metric
2026
2027
Revenue
--
--
EBITDA
--
--
AG

AgBiome

AgBiome is a microbial-platform agtech company that discovers, develops, and commercialises biological crop protection products (and licences the platform across adjacent markets).

alation.xlsx
Metric
2026
2027
Revenue
--
--
EBITDA
--
--
Alation logo

Alation

Enterprise data intelligence platform - data catalog, governance, and metadata management for large organisations.

archer-spac.xlsx
Metric
2026
2027
Revenue
--
--
EBITDA
--
--
Archer SPAC logo

Archer SPAC

archera.xlsx
Metric
2026
2027
Revenue
--
--
EBITDA
--
--
AR

Archera

Cloud resource automation platform that continuously optimizes AWS commitment purchases, de-risks overcommitment, and automates FinOps workflows.

ardoq.xlsx
Metric
2026
2027
Revenue
--
--
EBITDA
--
--
Ardoq logo

Ardoq

Cloud-native Enterprise Architecture (EA) SaaS platform that helps large enterprises navigate digital transformation through automated data collection, graph-based architecture modelling, and change impact analysis.

ascend.xlsx
Metric
2026
2027
Revenue
--
--
EBITDA
--
--
Ascend logo

Ascend

Ascend.io is an enterprise big data automation platform ("Enterprise Intelligence Platform") that abstracts away the complexity of big data engineering so non-experts can build and run data pipelines.

athennian.xlsx
Metric
2026
2027
Revenue
--
--
EBITDA
--
--
Athennian logo

Athennian

Cloud-based legal entity management system (EMS) uniting entity data with workflow and document automation.

auditboard.xlsx
Metric
2026
2027
Revenue
--
--
EBITDA
--
--
Auditboard logo

Auditboard

Cloud-based integrated risk management platform connecting audit, risk, compliance, and ESG teams across the enterprise.

Go further

Build the financial model you need with Fina

Browse templates, examples, and downloadable Excel models for the analysis you are trying to build. If you can't find your model, ask Fina to build a model for your specific needs.

Start for free
Excel financial model spreadsheet preview showing Customer Rollforward
Fina interactive chat interface preview