QuestDB logo
QuestDB Financial Model

Dev Tools Startup Financials (Free Excel Download)

Open-source, high-performance time-series database built for extreme ingestion speed and low-latency SQL queries.

Loading...

Used by professionals from

KPMG logoWharton logoColumbia logoESSEC logoPwC logoHEC logo

About this model

QuestDB is an Apache 2.0 open-source time-series database written in Java and C++ after six years of R&D. It differentiates on fast ingestion, standard SQL, and a small footprint for finance, industrial, mobility, data-science, and operations workloads requiring high throughput and low latency.

The company was pre-revenue, with a hosted cloud SaaS product and enterprise features planned on top of the OSS base. Its developer-led strategy uses community adoption and lighthouse relationships before enterprise upsell; the research gives no pricing, paying customer count, or current licence revenue.

From August 2020 to May 2021, deployments rose from 500 to 5,500, demo users from 1,000 to 16,000, and GitHub stars from 1,200 to 4,700. Airbus and Yahoo are named users. The model should forecast deployments, cloud conversion, workloads, licences, infrastructure cost, churn, and adoption.

A turnkey financial model

Live formulas, no hardcoded values

Outputs are driven by live formulas, so the workbook updates from its assumptions instead of relying on hardcoded results.

All assumptions in one tab

Inputs are clearly marked in the Assumptions tab and separated from calculations, making it clear what to change and what to leave intact.

Statements always balancing

For integrated-statement models, the balance sheet, cash flow, and supporting schedules tie through properly.

Distinct schedules for clarity

Debt, working capital, taxes, and cash flow can get messy quickly. We group calculations in clear schedules, not across disconnected tabs.

No hidden macros or external links

There are no unexplained external workbook links or macros to undermine auditability or portability.

Changes flow through the model

Update a key driver and see the impact carry through the forecast, financing, and return outputs. We never use hardcoded numbers in formulas.

About QuestDB

questdb.io
Read the pitch deck
QuestDB pitch deck cover
View on makeslides.com
Total raised
$15.0M
Funding round
Series A
Founded
2021
Category
Dev Tools
Customer
B2B
Geography
Not in deck

How to build a detailed financial model for QuestDB

A complete walkthrough of the business, drivers, and assumptions behind the downloadable QuestDB model - distilled from its pitch deck and publicly available information.

Product & value proposition

  • Time-series database written from scratch in Java/C++ over 6 years of R&D; 300k lines of code.
  • Key differentiators: (1) fastest ingestion rate vs. InfluxDB and TimescaleDB at 100, 1M, and 10M device scale (benchmark: Time Series Benchmarking Suite); (2) standard SQL interface (no proprietary query language); (3) tiny footprint vs. competitors; (4) Apache 2.0 licensed.
  • Deployment: self-hosted OSS today; fully hosted cloud and enterprise features on roadmap.
  • Team from low-latency trading desks at HSBC, UBS, Morgan Stanley, Merrill Lynch, bp - claim enterprise understanding of high-throughput/low-latency needs.

Market

  • No explicit TAM/SAM/SOM figures in deck.
  • Market context provided directionally: Time-series is the fastest-growing database category on DB-Engines popularity index (Nov-18 → May-21), rising from ~100 to ~200 vs. flat/slow growth for Relational, Search, Document, Graph.
  • 79% of time-series databases tracked on DB-Engines are open-source; 21% closed-source.
  • Use-case volumes cited: Manufacturing - 3M metrics/min/sensor; FinTech - 10B daily market data updates; Asset Tracking - 500M daily device position updates.

Revenue model

  • No current revenue disclosed. Pre-revenue at time of deck.
  • Planned monetisation:
  1. Fully hosted cloud solution (SaaS, usage-based expected).
  2. Enterprise features (likely seat/subscription licence over OSS core).
  • Go-to-market: developer-led / OSS community → lighthouse customer relationships → enterprise upsell; target verticals: FinTech, Data Science, Industrial, Mobility, ITOps.

Traction & metrics

All metrics are community/adoption - no revenue or paying customer counts disclosed.

MetricAug-20May-21
Unique deployed instances5005,500
Demo users1,00016,000
Slack members250800
GitHub contributors1570
GitHub stars1,2004,700
  • GitHub stars Sep-20 → Sep-21: ~1,800 → ~4,800+ (steep acceleration from Mar-21 onward).
  • Community members (Orbit) Jun-19 → Jun-21: ~0 → ~5,000.
  • Unique deployed instances Sep-20 → Sep-21: ~800 → ~5,000+.
  • Headline claim: "Users grew by 500% since January [2021]".
  • Named enterprise users: Airbus, Yahoo, Kepler Cheuvreux.
  • #10 launch on Hacker News ever; GitHub release of the month.

Competition / moat

Competitors identified:

  • InfluxDB: slow ingestion, proprietary query language, huge footprint, MIT licence.
  • TimescaleDB: slow, SQL, huge footprint, Apache 2.0 + Timescale licence.
  • kdb+ (kx): fast, proprietary language, tiny footprint, closed source.
  • Amazon Timestream: very slow, SQL, huge, closed source.

QuestDB positioning: Fast + SQL + Tiny footprint + Apache 2.0 - only player combining all four.

Moat claims:

  • 6 years R&D / written from scratch - high replication cost.
  • Strong OSS community (5k+ members, 70 contributors) with YC OSS group backing (GitLab, Docker, Supabase, PostHog, NGINX, Fivetran, GitHub, Mattermost, InfluxDB, Citus, Armory).
  • Advisory network: Tom Preston-Werner (GitHub), Sebastien Pahl (Docker), Alexis Ohanian (Reddit), Andrew Alexeev (NGINX), Paul Copplestone (Supabase), Sumedh Pathak (Citus/Microsoft), James Hawkins (PostHog), et al..

Team & funding ask / use of funds

  • Founding team: low-latency trading desk background (HSBC, UBS, Morgan Stanley, Merrill, bp). Individual names not shown in deck.
  • Prior funding: $2.3M Seed. YCombinator S20.
  • Current ask: $12M.
  • Use of funds:
  • Developer adoption KPIs: GitHub stars, contributors, unique instances.
  • Product: fully hosted cloud solution + enterprise features.
  • GTM: customer development, lighthouse customer relationships, developer advocacy, content, partnerships.
  • Hiring: customer success, dev rel, GTM, operations, core database, frontend, cloud engineers.
  • Roadmap timeline (Now → Jun-22): Cloud MVP → Serverless cloud → ML + geospatial dimensions.

Recommended financial model

  • Archetype + why: OSS-led SaaS - usage-based cloud + enterprise licence.

QuestDB is a classic open-core / PLG (product-led growth) company. Revenue does not exist yet; the model must project from zero through OSS funnel → cloud conversion → enterprise licence. The community-size and instance metrics are the leading indicators. Usage-based cloud (consumption of compute/storage/ingest volume) is the standard for time-series cloud DBs (InfluxDB Cloud, Timescale Cloud). Enterprise adds a seat/subscription tier on top for SSO, RBAC, SLAs.

  • Forecast horizon & granularity: 5 years (2021–2026), quarterly for years 1–2 (product build + early cloud revenue), annual thereafter. Pre-revenue through ~Q1-Q2 2022 while cloud MVP ships.
  • Key drivers & assumptions:

*OSS funnel:*

  • Unique deployed instances: 5,500 at May-21; grow at 15–20%/month declining to 5%/month by Y3 - consistent with 500% YTD growth decelerating post-product-market fit.
  • Cloud conversion rate: 2–5% of active instances convert to paid cloud - typical OSS-to-cloud conversion benchmark.
  • Enterprise conversion rate: 0.5–1% of instances, or sourced via direct sales from lighthouse accounts.

*Cloud revenue (usage-based):*

  • ARPU cloud: $500–$2,000/month per customer - benchmarked against InfluxDB Cloud / Timescale Cloud pricing tiers for mid-market data engineering workloads.
  • Net revenue retention: 110–130% (usage grows as customers ingest more data over time).

*Enterprise revenue (licence):*

  • ACV enterprise: $50k–$200k - consistent with enterprise time-series DB deals in FinTech/industrial verticals.
  • Sales cycle: 3–6 months.
  • Target lighthouse count by end Y1: 5–10 paying enterprise logos.

*Cost structure:*

  • R&D: majority of headcount pre-cloud; 60–70% of OpEx Y1, declining to 40% by Y3.
  • S&M: ramp from near-zero (PLG) to 25–30% of OpEx as enterprise sales team builds.
  • G&A: 10–15% of OpEx.
  • Gross margin: 65–75% at scale for usage-based cloud (cloud infrastructure cost embedded); 85–90% for enterprise licence.
  • Hosting/COGS: scales with cloud revenue; benchmarked on AWS/GCP pricing for compute + storage.

*Funding:*

  • $12M Series A; model runway against burn rate - 18–24 months to meaningful cloud revenue.
  • Scenarios (Base / Bull / Bear - which variables flex):
  • Base: Cloud MVP ships Q2-Q3 2022; 3% OSS-to-cloud conversion; 5 enterprise logos by end Y2; cloud ARPU $1,000/month.
  • Bull: Faster OSS instance growth (viral developer adoption continues); higher conversion (6%); enterprise deals land via Airbus/Yahoo/Kepler Cheuvreux relationships; ARPU expands via usage.
  • Bear: Cloud MVP delayed to Q4 2022; conversion 1%; enterprise sales cycle drags; competing InfluxDB/Timescale cloud offers cut into conversion; funding needed earlier than runway suggests.
  • Required sheets / outputs:
  1. OSS Funnel - instances, community members, GitHub stars (leading indicators).
  2. Revenue Build - Cloud (usage-based ARR) + Enterprise (licence ARR); waterfall by cohort.
  3. P&L - Revenue → Gross Profit → EBITDA; quarterly Y1–Y2, annual Y3–Y5.
  4. Headcount Plan - engineering, cloud, sales, dev rel, G&A.
  5. Cash Flow & Runway - monthly burn, cash balance, months to next raise.
  6. KPI Dashboard - ARR, NRR, cloud customers, enterprise logos, CAC payback (once data available).

Frequently asked

Is the QuestDB financial model free?+

Yes. The QuestDB model is a free Excel (.xlsx) download with live formulas. Sign up with your email and the workbook is yours to keep, review, and edit.

What's included in the model?+

A 5-year monthly forecast with P&L, cash flow and runway, valuation (exit multiple plus a DCF cross-check), MOIC/IRR returns, and unit economics, with live formulas throughout.

How was this model built?+

It was built from QuestDB's pitch deck and publicly available information, then structured to investment-banking standards as a fully editable Excel model.

Can I change the assumptions?+

Yes. You can change assumptions and the live formulas will recalculate in the downloadable Excel model.

Have more financial modelling questions? Contact us

Alex Tapio, ex-Deloitte financial modelling expert

Created by ex-finance professionals

Hey, I’m Alex and I created Finamodel.

Over my years in the finance industry I kept building the same models over and over again. Same structure, same assumptions, different logo. So I started building frameworks to turn them into clean, reusable templates.

Every model here is one I’d actually use for a client, and I personally vet each one before it goes up.

I’m not an expert in every industry, but I’ve built enough models to know what belongs in one. And when something is completely foreign to me, I reach out to my network for experts to work on our models with us.

Having a template library on hand cuts a first build from hours to minutes.

Need help finding your model? You’ll find me in the Finamodel app!

Other Dev Tools Startup Financial Models

Browse another startup in the same category.

8base.xlsx
Metric
2026
2027
Revenue
--
--
EBITDA
--
--
8base logo

8base

Low-code/no-code platform providing backend and frontend development tools for building digital products, internal apps, and SaaS.

ably.xlsx
Metric
2026
2027
Revenue
--
--
EBITDA
--
--
AB

Ably

Enterprise realtime messaging infrastructure (pub/sub) delivered as a cloud-native platform, enabling developers to build scalable live experiences without managing complex realtime infrastructure.

amplitude.xlsx
Metric
2026
2027
Revenue
--
--
EBITDA
--
--
Amplitude logo

Amplitude

Mobile analytics SaaS platform giving app developers real-time behavioral analytics, funnel/retention analysis, and raw data warehouse access at scale.

anima.xlsx
Metric
2026
2027
Revenue
--
--
EBITDA
--
--
AN

Anima

Automated design-to-code platform - designers export production-ready code from their design tools with one click.

apollo.xlsx
Metric
2026
2027
Revenue
--
--
EBITDA
--
--
Apollo logo

Apollo

Apollo builds and sells an enterprise "data graph" platform (powered by GraphQL) that sits as a unified API layer between frontend apps and backend microservices.

browserstack.xlsx
Metric
2026
2027
Revenue
--
--
EBITDA
--
--
BR

BrowserStack

Cloud-based cross-browser and mobile app testing platform used by 50,000+ customers across 135 countries.

codesandbox.xlsx
Metric
2026
2027
Revenue
--
--
EBITDA
--
--
CO

CodeSandbox

Cloud-native collaborative web IDE that lets entire product teams (not just developers) code, review, and iterate together in the browser.

commandbar.xlsx
Metric
2026
2027
Revenue
--
--
EBITDA
--
--
CO

CommandBar

SaaS SDK that embeds a search-based command bar into web apps, improving UX, onboarding, and retention for B2B software companies.

Go further

Build the financial model you need with Fina

Browse templates, examples, and downloadable Excel models for the analysis you are trying to build. If you can't find your model, ask Fina to build a model for your specific needs.

Start for free
Excel financial model spreadsheet preview showing Customer Rollforward
Fina interactive chat interface preview