Trampoline Park Model
Operating Businesses Financial Model (Free Excel Download)
Model trampoline-park economics through attendance, memberships, parties, concessions, capacity, staffing, rent, insurance, maintenance, local marketing, and site-level EBITDA.
professionals from Deloitte
Used by professionals from






About this model
This trampoline park model reflects the choices that make family entertainment venues different: general admission, birthday parties, and memberships all compete for the same physical space. It shows how demand and available court time shape revenue.
Use it to plan pricing, capacity expansion, or a new venue. You can see whether more parties or members add value overall once their effect on walk-in capacity and operating costs is considered.
What every model includes
Live formulas, no hardcoded values
Outputs are driven by live formulas, so the workbook updates from its assumptions instead of relying on hardcoded results.
All assumptions in one tab
Inputs are clearly marked in the Assumptions tab and separated from calculations, making it clear what to change and what to leave intact.
Statements always balancing
For integrated-statement models, the balance sheet, cash flow, and supporting schedules tie through properly.
Distinct schedules for clarity
Debt, working capital, taxes, and cash flow can get messy quickly. We group calculations in clear schedules, not across disconnected tabs.
No hidden macros or external links
There are no unexplained external workbook links or macros to undermine auditability or portability.
Changes flow through the model
Update a key driver and see the impact carry through the forecast, financing, and return outputs. We never use hardcoded numbers in formulas.
What's inside the Trampoline Park Model
- Court inputs: opening court count, expansion trigger and size, operating hours/days, jumper-density safety cap
- Party inputs: bookings/year and growth, hours reserved per booking, package price and escalation
- Membership inputs: signup pace, churn rate, visits/member, annual dues rate and escalation
- Demand inputs: single-visit demand and growth, GA ticket price and escalation, F&B per-cap and escalation
- Cost stack: court-monitor staffing ratio and wage, management/occupancy step costs, marketing, G&A, liability insurance rate
- Capital and working capital: new-court capex, maintenance capex, periodic mat-replacement cycle, AR/inventory/AP days, Year-0 NWC seed
- Valuation: WACC, terminal growth, net debt, shares outstanding
- Operations sheet: court roll-forward on a live utilization trigger, party/member/walk-in capacity waterfall, membership roll-forward, working capital, capex and depreciation
Trampoline Park Financial Model: Capacity, Parties, and Memberships
This trampoline park financial model captures a distinctive operating challenge: birthday parties and memberships compete for the same finite court-hours as walk-in general admission. The model shows how party bookings displace GA capacity and how membership dues create a deferred revenue liability.
It helps evaluate pricing, capacity expansion, and channel mix decisions. Rates and financial results described here reflect illustrative model settings, not industry benchmarks.
Operating Drivers: Parties, Members, and Walk-Ins
The model's core relationships start with court-hours, calculated as courts multiplied by 11 operating hours per day and 355 operating days per year. Demand flows through a three-tier waterfall.
- Party bookings are served first and unconditionally, each reserving one court for 1.5 hours. Member visits follow as a prepaid entitlement in the model, with each member visiting eight times annually.
- Single-visit walk-in demand fills whatever court-hours remain, capped by a safety-density limit of 4.3 jumpers per court-hour. This sequential allocation means the premium party channel subtracts supply from the mass-market walk-in channel rather than simply competing alongside it.
Party demand grows at 13.0% annually, walk-in demand at 12.0%, and member signups at 7.0% with a 35% annual churn. These rates force notable capacity squeezes in specific years.
Calculation Flow: Court Expansion and Capacity Binding
Court expansion follows a one-year-lagged rule: courts increase by four if prior-year blended utilization exceeds 97%. Because this trigger reacts only to a year that has already crossed the line, the ceiling can bind hard before help arrives.
- In the model, Year 2 closes below the threshold, but Year 3's growth on a flat court count pushes utilization past 100%, leaving demand unserved. Courts then open in Year 4, resetting utilization.
- A second squeeze occurs in Year 7, with relief landing beyond the model's horizon. This squeeze-then-relief-then-squeeze pattern is a central output, showing how demand growth interacts with lumpy capacity additions.
The model also isolates the party channel's contribution to unserved demand, revealing that party growth alone accounts for a substantial portion of the first bottleneck.
Outputs: Revenue, P&L, and Valuation
The model produces a four-line revenue build: general admission tickets, party packages, membership dues, and food and beverage per-capita spending. Cost of revenue is priced per line rather than blended, with party host labor, favors, and F&B cost of goods separate from near-zero direct costs on tickets and dues.
- A court-monitor safety labor line scales with court-hours open, reflecting an insurance-driven staffing ratio. Management, marketing, occupancy, and elevated general-liability insurance complete the cost structure.
- The P&L flows to EBITDA, EBIT, and net income. An unlevered free-cash-flow bridge discounts NOPAT plus depreciation, less capex and working capital changes, at WACC.
Working capital nets the unearned-membership liability as a cash source. Enterprise value derives from explicit-period present value plus a Gordon-growth terminal value, less net debt, yielding equity value and value per share.
Practical Use: Evaluating Mix and Capacity Decisions
This layout suits a single-location venue evaluating how party bookings, memberships, and walk-in traffic interact. The membership module treats annual dues as a recurring subscription liability, with unearned revenue carried at 50% of closing members times the dues rate.
- Member visits dilute blended GA revenue per visit even though they carry no incremental ticket price, because the denominator includes both paying and non-paying visits. The model's disclosed counterfactual shows that holding party bookings flat would have freed enough court-hours to cover a majority of the first capacity shortfall.
- For an operator or analyst, the dashboard consolidates courts, blended utilization, party share of court-hours, unearned membership liability, revenue, EBITDA, and value per share. This helps assess whether promoting parties or memberships adds overall value once their effect on walk-in capacity and operating costs is considered.



Formatted to IB standards
Named theme colors repaint the whole workbook in one click, on top of an investment-banking structure with clear input, output, and cross-sheet reference styling - brand-ready, institutional-grade, and fully auditable.
Created by ex-finance professionals
Hey, I’m Alex and I created Finamodel.
Over my years in the finance industry I kept building the same models over and over again. Same structure, same assumptions, different logo. So I started building frameworks to turn them into clean, reusable templates.
Every model here is one I’d actually use for a client, and I personally vet each one before it goes up.
I’m not an expert in every industry, but I’ve built enough models to know what belongs in one. And when something is completely foreign to me, I reach out to my network for experts to work on our models with us.
Having a template library on hand cuts a first build from hours to minutes.
Need help finding your model? You’ll find me in the Finamodel app!
Frequently asked
What is a trampoline park financial model?+
A trampoline park financial model captures the seven-year operating economics and intrinsic value of a single-location indoor trampoline park / family entertainment center. It resolves general-admission, party and membership demand against one finite pool of court-hours through a three-tier capacity waterfall, builds a real subscription liability for prepaid membership dues, and discounts an unlevered free-cash-flow stream to enterprise value, equity value and value per share.
Why do party bookings hurt general-admission capacity instead of just adding revenue?+
A birthday party reserves an entire court exclusively for the length of the booking - nobody else can jump on that court while a party is running. That is structurally different from a format like a bowling alley, where a private event just books existing lanes alongside walk-in play. Modeling the exclusive-use reservation explicitly is what lets the party channel's own growth genuinely squeeze walk-in capacity, rather than being a costless add-on.
Why does the capacity ceiling bind in years the model didn't see coming?+
Court expansion responds to a live formula checking whether the prior year's utilization crossed a trigger - the same pattern this library's imaging-center uses. Because the check only looks backward, a year that itself jumps from comfortable to over-capacity in one step binds before any order has been placed, and relief only arrives the following year. That is a deliberate, honest reflection of how a single-location operator actually finds out it is undersized - not a smoothed assumption.
Why is membership revenue modeled separately from the unearned membership liability?+
Membership revenue is what the P&L recognizes as dues are earned ratably over the year; the unearned membership liability is the balance-sheet obligation for dues already collected but not yet earned. Keeping them as two distinct lines - rather than collapsing dues straight to revenue - is what lets the model show a real, growing subscription liability that nets against working capital as a genuine source of cash, the same treatment this library gives every other deposit-style liability.
Have more financial modelling questions? Contact us
Related templates
Bowling Alley Model
Plan and value a bowling and family entertainment center using lane utilization, shoe rentals, arcade revenue, F&B, and a DCF.
Escape Room Operator Model
Plan and value an escape room venue using room slot capacity, game utilization, re-theming cycles, and a DCF.
Campground / RV Resort Model
Plan and value a campground and RV resort using transient nightly sites, seasonal leases, occupancy rates, and a DCF.
Food Manufacturing Model
Operating model for food production and processing businesses with ingredient sourcing, production scheduling, and margin analysis.

